I believe we all remember what happened in October 2020 when Netflix aired The Queen’s Gambit. A fictional girl from Kentucky did more for chess than a century of tournament bulletins. During lockdown, people who couldn’t even spell “Sicilian” were suddenly playing blitz at 2am. Online platforms exploded, chess sets vanished from shelves and for once, young girls saw someone who looked like them sitting at the board and winning. That, of course, was fiction based on a novel with the same title.
Now Netflix turns to the real thing. Queen of Chess is a 94-minute documentary on Judit Polgár. Born in communist Hungary, Judit was part of her father László’s grand theory that geniuses are made, not born. The Polgár sisters were home-schooled and they studied chess every day. So there was no ordinary childhood in the conventional sense. László laid down the discipline, structure and endless calculations for Judit and her two elder sisters, Zsuzsa and Sofia. To him, they were his experiment first and daughters second.
By 12 she was already the top-rated female player in the world. At 15 she became the youngest grandmaster in history at the time, breaking Bobby Fischer’s record. Later she broke into the world top ten. To this day she remains the only woman to have done so. She refused to play in women-only events. She wanted to test herself against the very best, and she did.
The red thread running through the film is Garry Kasparov. In fact, at times the documentary felt almost as much about him as about Judit, with the former world champion cast, fairly or not, as the antagonist in her ascent. Their first clash in Linares 1994 was revisited, including the infamous touch-move incident that caused such debate. To this day Kasparov does not quite concede that he was wholly wrong, although he has admitted that he might have let go of the knight for one-tenth of a second. For years she chased him. In 2002 she finally beat him. The handshake was not warm, and Kasparov quickly exited through a side door. The point, however, was decisive.
The documentary blends archival footage from Olympiads, Linares, Hungarian Championships with present-day interviews. Judit comes across without arrogance but there is resolve in her voice. She speaks about having to prove herself “ten times more” than if she had been born a boy. That line alone sums up half the battle.
Some early reviews praised the film for giving her a recognition that was long overdue. Others felt it did not dig deeply enough into the emotional cost of being raised as part of an experiment. There is a telling moment when she is asked how it felt. A pause, a slight drift of the eyes, but no dramatic outburst.
Will Queen of Chess trigger another global boom like The Queen’s Gambit? I doubt it. Fiction is easier to romanticise, and that series arrived at the perfect moment during a pandemic when the world was stuck at home. Today, the chess audience is far larger than it was five years ago. Many newcomers know the fictional Beth Harmon. Far fewer know Judit Polgár, and she was the one that really changed chess history long before Netflix took notice of the game. If this film does nothing else, it should remind people where the real story began.





















.jpeg)














